Just noticed this over on Stack Overflow, wondering if anyone has experience here.
Currently im working on a computer vision system using a Ricoh Theta 360 camera. The camera livestreams the data to a computer over usb 2.0
I started a stopwatch online, aimed the camera lens at it and took a screenshot to compare the actual time passed with the time that the camera output showed and it has a difference of ~175ms.
I’ve read that the latency will be lower when using a camera with an usb 3.0 usb port but I don’t get the theory behind it. Since the current stream shows no lag or framedrops the usb 2.0 can obviously handle the data I assume. why would this be better with an usb 3.0 port?